Comparing population data for regions that differ a lot in absolute numbers poses some challenges. While percentages come to mind population pyramids using percentages are a lot less familiar and are prone to mis-interpretation. But oftentimes absolute numbers means you have to adjust scales.
In the example below a clear indicator appears when the two population pyramids are scaled differently (which is not the case in all combinations). Here you see a region in the western part of Germany (the state of Hesse on the left) compared to one in the eastern part (Saxony). The latter showing an additional bulge (born in the 1980s).
While the above example had been around for a while, it was updated today both in terms of data and technology wise. The data is Germany’s latest population projection broken down to the “Länder” level (=NUTS1). You can check out the population pyramid comparison at http://www.destatis.de/laenderpyramiden/
This population pyramid is now using the SVG Web toolkit so that it runs out of the box in modern browsers and in Internet Explorer just as well with the help of the Flash plugin.
And while we’re at the topic, let me plug the Animated Population Pyramid of Estonia which was recently published using the same code-base.
Today Statistics Germany published their latest population projection until the year 2060. Together with this data the animated population pyramid was updated as well.
Most notable is a new layout that will put the assumptions right beside the pyramid and will let you switch between four different scenarios for the future (different assumptions for: fertility, life-expectancy, net-migration).
Thanks to the SVG Web library it will work in any browser and takes full advantages of open web standards, namely Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG). Watch a short screencast to see all of the functionality.
Then check it out for yourself, it’s available in english, french, german and russian at
Internet Explorer will need the Flash plugin to make this happen, all other browsers don’t.
Postscriptum: It seems, ONS published similar data today with a different approach in visualizing. Check it out, compare and please comment.
On this blog we usually showcase best practices of how to communicate statistics and keep the technological aspects of it in the background – which is the right way to do. But we also never get tired of mentioning how statistics is a basis for informed decision making and therefore a foundation for democracy. To live up to these standards we make sure our methods are well documented and I would argue we should also give some thoughts on what technology we use.
There are two reasons for this: We should allow our users to learn from our applications on the web, build upon them, mash them up with other stuff we didn’t imagine or even improve them. And secondly when we talk about archiving in the digital age, we are well advised to use open standards. Everyone of us who recently tried to open some old Word 2.0 documents will understand what I mean.
The topic comes up as several statistical offices have moved from the SVG format for interactive statistical graphics to Flash. See the latest population pyramid from ONS or the election atlas in Germany. While SVG is an open graphics standard just like HTML, you can think of Flash more like Word documents, those are closed binary files. Users cannot look behind the scenes and if the source code gets forgotten or the technology changes dramatically, all is lost.
Now there is a flipside to it: Just like Microsoft Word, Flash is ubiquitous, works really well and works the same way across all supported platforms. SVG on the other hand had its ups and downs. Since 2008 it is very well supported on modern browsers such as Opera, Firefox, Safari and Google Chrome but even Internet Explorer 8 doesn’t handle it at all. There was a plugin for Internet Explorer, but that never had the significant market share that Flash enjoyed (no YouTube without Flash!) and was “end of lifed” in January 2009, meaning SVG support on Internet Explorer was gone at the beginning of this year. So why all the bemoaning, free and open doesn’t allways win.
Well, things are changing right now. With the help of Google an open source project aims at adding SVG support to Internet Explorer through the Flash plugin. And they are aiming high, want to implement it in Wikipedia, which uses SVG as a base format for all their graphics and maps. It’s called the SVG Web project, and already it works well enough to support our use-cases. I’ve put up an animated population pyramid and an interactive map with it and couldn’t be happier.
Even in Internet Explorer you can right click in the graphics and “view source”, see how everything was done, adapt it, improve it … And when your are using Firefox or Safari you can print these graphics into PDF and get print quality vector graphics.
Give it a look, talk about it with your tech people and let me know what you think. We have comments here for a reason.